tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1324184304367023797.post2766606642344063256..comments2023-10-17T05:41:41.681-04:00Comments on Katharine A. Cartwright Studio: Kant's LegacyAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11037549177881696434noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1324184304367023797.post-11452783465690589632013-03-21T15:24:26.407-04:002013-03-21T15:24:26.407-04:00Hi Hallie, I suppose Bullough might have meant tha...Hi Hallie, I suppose Bullough might have meant that you can't see art in a literal or meaningful way (content) but rather experience it through the emotions. But, I'm not certain that's it. Love your sense of humor, as always!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11037549177881696434noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1324184304367023797.post-70608455835764969252013-03-20T17:11:03.321-04:002013-03-20T17:11:03.321-04:00Merriam-Webster wouldn't supply the definition...Merriam-Webster wouldn't supply the definition of "phychical distance" unless I signed up for a free trial, so I'm lost but following this discussion.<br /><br />I've always felt that art can't really be defined--it's a bit like pinning down air.hw (hallie) farberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11636182620056350811noreply@blogger.com